Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because  how to reduce emf exposure  transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.

While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.


But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
how to protect yourself from 5g  on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In  how to reduce emf exposure , psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.